Sustained Dynamics of Saccadic Inhibition and Adaptive Oculomotor Responses during Continuous Exploration
- Celeste Cafaro1,*,
- Giovanni Cirillo2,*,
- Giovanna Vermiglio3,
- Carlo Cavaliere4,
- Alessio Fracasso5,6,‡ and
- Antimo Buonocore1,‡
- 1Department of Educational, Psychological and Communication Sciences, Suor Orsola Benincasa University, Naples 80135, Italy
- 2Division of Human Anatomy - Neuronal Networks Morphology and Systems Biology Lab, Department of Mental, Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples 80138, Italy
- 3Department of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina 98122, Italy
- 4IRCCS Synlab SDN, Naples 80143, Italy
- 5Department of Psychology, University of Padua, Padua 35131, Italy
- 6School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QE5, United Kingdom
- Correspondence should be addressed to Antimo Buonocore at antimo.buonocore{at}unisob.na.it.
-
Author contributions: C.C., G.C., G.V., C.Cav., A.F., and A.B. designed research; C.C. and A.B. performed research; C.C., G.C., A.F., and A.B. analyzed data; C.C., G.C., G.V., C.Cav., A.F., and A.B. wrote the paper.
Abstract
In natural environments, stimuli recur across time and space, requiring the visual system to remain sensitive to novelty while managing predictability. A central question in systems neuroscience is how motor systems adapt to repeated sensory events without compromising responsiveness. We investigated this adaptive capacity using saccadic inhibition (SI)—a reflexive suppression of eye movements triggered by sudden visual transients—as a probe of oculomotor dynamics during naturalistic viewing. Human participants (17 females, 4 males) freely explored visual arrays while brief gaze-contingent flashes appeared five times at random intervals, either foveally or parafoveally. SI reliably occurred ∼120 ms postflash across repetitions and locations, indicating sensory-driven inhibition. However, the rebound phase—reflecting saccade reprogramming—showed a progressive decline. In a second experiment (14 females, 5 males), only the first or the fifth flash was visible on each trial. In this case, neither inhibition nor rebound was altered, suggesting that the rebound decline is driven by repeated sensory stimulation rather than exploration time. This dissociation reveals selective habituation of motor re-engagement mechanisms, while reflexive inhibitory gating remains stable. We propose that inhibition is mediated by circuitry that transiently suppresses saccade initiation and resists habituation. In contrast, the weakening rebound reflects a separate, habituation-prone route that reduces saccade generation to irrelevant events. Functionally, this imbalance implies a recalibration within the saccade generator, preserving inhibitory capacity while constraining motor output. Our findings uncover a distinct form of oculomotor habituation and demonstrate how SI reveals dynamic decoupling of sensory input and motor output under repeated stimulation.
Footnotes
-
A.B., C.C., G.C., and G.V are supported by a grant from the Italian Minister of Research and University (PRIN 2022_PNRR-P2022ST78T). C.C. and G.C. were supported by #NEXTGENERATIONEU (NGEU) and funded by the Ministry of University and Research (MUR), National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), project MNESYS (PE0000006)—a multiscale integrated approach to the study of the nervous system in health and disease (DN. 1553 11.10.2022). A.F. was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biology Research Council (BBSRC; Grant Number, BB/S006605/1) and the Bial Foundation (Bial Foundation; Grant ID, A-29315; number, 203/2020; grant edition, G-15516). The author(s) used ChatGPT (OpenAI) as a grammar and language correction tool to improve the clarity and readability of the manuscript.
-
↵*C.C and G.C. share first authorship.
-
↵‡A.F. and A.B. share last authorship.
-
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Received September 27, 2025.
- Revision received February 26, 2026.
- Accepted March 11, 2026.
- Copyright © 2026 the authors





