Distinct Changes in Cortical Acetylcholine and Noradrenaline Efflux during Contingent and Noncontingent Performance of a Visual Attentional Task

Table 1.

Baseline performance of future contingent and noncontingent subjects on the five-choice serial reaction time task

Contingent subjects Noncontingent subjects Group Day
Correct responses 77  ± 1 78  ± 1 F(1,18) = 0.03;p = 0.88 F(6,108) = 1.45;p = 0.20
Choice accuracy (%) 86.9  ± 1.2 87  ± 0.4 F(1,18) = 0.01;p = 0.98 F(6,108) = 0.63;p = 0.71
Omissions 12  ± 1 12  ± 1 F(1,18) = 0.01;p = 0.96 F(6,108) = 2.25;p = 0.06
Correct latencies (csec) 51.2  ± 0.7 51.8  ± 0.6 F(1,18) = 0.10;p = 0.76 F(6,108) = 0.76;p = 0.60
ITI magazine entries 76  ± 3 77  ± 3 F(1,18) = 0.01;p = 0.97 F(6,108) = 0.21;p = 0.97
Premature responses 9  ± 0.5 9  ± 0.5 F(1,18) = 0.03;p = 0.87 F(6,108) = 0.68;p = 0.67
  • The data are responses (rounded up to the nearest whole number), choice accuracy (percentage of correct responses relative to total correct and incorrect responses), and response latencies (csec), averaged over seven daily 30 min sessions (n = 10). ANOVA results for between (group)- and within (day)-subject effects are shown for each behavioral variable.

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 21 no. 13 4908-4914
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement