Table 1.
Percentages of antidromic phase shifting at different wavelengths in sine oculis1 and sine oculis1 ; glass60j mutants
| nm | n | so1 antidromic | Percentage | n | so1; gl60j antidromic | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 369 | 14 | 1 | 7.1 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 395 | 11 | 3 | 27.3 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| 412.5 | 26 | 5 | 19.2 | 26 | 1 | 3.9 |
| 420 | 21 | 4 | 19.1 | 15 | 4 | 26.7 |
| 445 | 17 | 7 | 41.2 | 15 | 2 | 13.3 |
| 456 | 25 | 12 | 44.0 | 14 | 1 | 7.1 |
| 472 | 17 | 12 | 70.6 | 10 | 1 | 10.0 |
| 486 | 21 | 15 | 71.4 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| 526 | 16 | 14 | 87.5 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 546 | 13 | 10 | 76.9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 600 | 1 | 1 | (100) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
-
Antidromic phase shifting of so1 flies was highly dependent on the wavelength (χ2(8,182) = 49.55; p < 0.0001; data at 369 and 395 nm and at 546 and 600 nm pooled). Furthermore, so1 flies overall showed significantly more antidromic phase shifting thanso1; gl60j flies (χ2(1,301) = 50.19; p < 0.0001; data for all wavelengths pooled).
