Motor Inhibition Affects the Speed But Not Accuracy of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 11.
Figure 11.

Leg movements are slower after photoablation of CI1. A, Maximum angular velocities of the thoraco-coxal, coxo-trochanteral, and femoro-tibial joints for scratches aimed at anterior (a) and posterior (p) target stimulation sites. Gray bars, CI1 intact; black bars, CI1 photoablated. When the reduction in velocity was significant (Mann–Whitney U test with Holm-Bonferroni correction for repeated sampling), the corresponding “a” or “p” is circled. B, Mean angular velocities; details as for A. Data are from N = 10 animals, n = 38 anterior and 114 posterior scratches for CI1 intact scratches and 64 anterior and 157 posterior scratches for CI1 photoablated. Dep, Depression; Lev, levation; Flex, flexion; Ext, extension. Levation and extension velocities are negative by definition. Therefore, larger negative values indicate faster levations and extensions. Larger positive values indicate faster depressions and flexions. Asterisks indicate extreme outliers (>3 times interquartile range).

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 34 no. 22 7509-7521
  1. Free Access 
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
View Similar Articles
Similar articles in this journal»
    Advertisement