Motor Inhibition Affects the Speed But Not Accuracy of Aimed Limb Movements in an Insect

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Patterns of excitatory and inhibitory motor activity were related during aimed scratches. Cross-correlations were computed for all combinations of motor activity (see Materials and Methods), and the resulting curves for each of the animals were overlaid (gray curves in A–F, N = 6 animals). For each combination, a mean curve was also computed (black curves in A–F). A, CI1 versus SETi. B, CI1 versus FETi. C, CI1 versus flexor motor neurons. D, SETi versus FETi. E, SETi versus flexor motor neurons. F, FETi versus flexor motor neurons. To emphasize the temporal relationships between activity of CI1 and each of the other motor neuron recordings, the individual cross-correlation plots were also normalized to a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1 and centered before being averaged across animals (inset).

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 34 no. 22 7509-7521
  1. Free Access 
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
View Similar Articles
Similar articles in this journal»
    Advertisement