Table 2.
Number (percentage) of LFP recordings with significant serial-order tuning during the execution of the RTT, the SCT, and both tasks, obtained using different LFP alignments (tap- vs stimulus-aligned data)
| Tap | Stimulus | |
|---|---|---|
| RTT only (Group 1) | 163 (39.66) | 156 (38.81) |
| SCT only (Group 2) | 144 (35.04) | 118 (29.35) |
| Tuned both tasks (Group 3) | 104 (25.30) | 128 (31.84) |
-
Pooled data from the auditory and visual modalities were used to calculate proportions.
