Table 1.
RT for old/new responses and mean corrected recollection and familiarity rates
| REC | FAM | NEW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RT (ms) | 1173 (167) | 1393 (183) | 1416 (233) |
| Corrected hit rates (%) | 39.1 (15.8) | 20.8 (12.6) | — |
-
Mean values (± SD) are given based on n = 20 subjects. For mean RT, there was a main effect of condition (F(2,38) = 20.17, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.515, ϵ = 0.716). Responses were faster for REC compared with NEW (t(19) = 5.03, p < 0.001) and FAM (t(19) = 8.56, p < 0.001). There was no difference between FAM and NEW (t(19) = 0.47, p = 0.645).
