Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input

Table 1.

Results of univariate t contrasts between Congruence conditions at the group level

Region p (cluster) t/F statistic k voxels Coordinates (mm)
Repeated-measures ANOVA with factor Congruence
Right middle frontal <0.001 4.71 416 48 30 20
Left inferior occipital 0.001 4.68 280 −48 −62 −4
Right precentral sulcus <0.001 4.48 435 36 2 42
Left superior parietal 0.001 4.35 307 −24 −58 52
Right superior parietal <0.001 4.17 502 38 −46 44
Pre-SMA 0.008 4.12 205 6 16 54
Right insula 0.005 4.11 227 30 22 0
Right inferior occipital 0.008 3.68 205 52 −42 −8
Memorized > discarded t-contrast
Left inferior occipital 0.002 6.71 385 −48 −62 −4
Right precentral sulcus <0.001 6.03 865 46 30 22
Left superior parietal <0.001 5.70 516 −24 −60 54
Right superior parietal <0.001 5.23 688 38 −44 44
Left precentral sulcus 0.003 4.90 342 −46 0 44
Memorized > unrelated t-contrast
Right precentral sulcus <0.001 6.35 949 36 2 42
Left inferior occipital <0.001 5.45 550 −50 −58 −10
Right superior parietal 0.001 5.44 969 40 −46 42
Left superior parietal <0.001 5.35 850 −24 −58 52
Right inferior occipital <0.001 4.91 494 52 −50 −14
Left precentral sulcus <0.001 4.53 929 −34 −8 52
  • This table contains all clusters of voxels that were significantly (pFWE < 0.05, for cluster-defining voxel threshold puncorrected < 0.001) modulated by the factor Congruence at the group level. The upper part of the table refers to the one-way repeated-measures ANOVA that includes all three Congruence conditions (i.e., memorized, unrelated, and discarded), and the other two parts refer to the pairwise comparisons between Congruence conditions. No significant differences were found in the pairwise comparisons that are not reported here (i.e., discarded > memorized; unrelated > memorized; discarded > unrelated; and unrelated > discarded).

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 37 no. 28 6638-6647
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement