A Role for Cellular Prion Protein in Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence from Preclinical Studies
- Biological Chemistry Graduate Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 21941-902
-
↵*R.A.S.L.-F. and M.M.O. contributed equally to this work.
Introduction
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, affects 1 in 9 individuals >65 years old (Alzheimer's Association, 2016). Cognitive decline is the most distinctive symptom of AD, and it strongly correlates with synapse loss (Masliah et al., 1990; Terry et al., 1991). Currently, there is no effective strategy to halt or revert AD progression in patients; this can be partially attributed to the yet incipient knowledge of pathophysiological processes underlying disease progression.
The two major histopathological markers of AD are intracellular neurofibrillary tangles, formed by tau protein in its hyperphosphorylated form and extracellular plaques, composed of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides. Aβ peptide assembles into aggregates of various sizes, ranging from oligomers to fibrils, but soluble oligomers (AβOs) are most strongly correlated with disease severity (Bjorklund et al., 2012; Bilousova et al., 2016). In the last couple of decades, AβOs have consistently been found to be associated with synapse failure and loss, as well as with the memory decline germane to AD pathology (for review, see Ferreira et al., 2015). More recently, AβOs were shown to induce neuroinflammatory processes in AD brains, thereby influencing synaptic pruning and cognition (Hong et al., 2016; for review, see Santos and Ferreira, 2017). Importantly, pharmacological alleviation of AβO-induced inflammation is sufficient to prevent cognitive impairment in murine models of AD, indicating that inflammation is central to pathological processes (Ledo et al., 2016).
An intriguing aspect of AβOs is their capacity to bind to synaptic terminals and trigger neurotoxic signaling that leads to synaptic failure. On the quest to find potential “AβO receptors” at synapses, more than a dozen molecules have been shown to interact with AβOs (for review, see Ferreira et al., 2015). Notably, the cellular prion protein (PrPC) has high affinity for AβOs (Laurén et al., 2009). PrPC is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein localized to the plasma membrane, and it is expressed in most cell types in mammals, but particularly enriched in the nervous system (for review, see Linden et al., 2008). Although known to turn into a misfolded version that causes neurodegeneration in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, PrPC is thought to be involved in several normal physiological processes, such as multiprotein complex formation on the cell surface (for review, see Castle and Gill, 2017). However, the role of PrPC in synaptic plasticity remains controversial. An early report from Collinge et al. (1994) showed that hippocampal LTP was impaired in PrPC-null mice. Consistent with this, another report indicated that PrPC deletion alters neuronal excitability in hippocampal CA1 (Mallucci et al., 2002). However, Lledo et al. (1996) reported that PrPC deletion had no effects on hippocampal LTP formation.
Although AβOs may lead to memory failure through multiple mechanisms (Balducci et al., 2010), their interactions with PrPC have been shown to mediate aberrant signaling pathways, synapse loss, and cognitive decline in AD models (for review, see Salazar and Strittmatter, 2017). Binding of AβOs to PrPC recruits Type 5 metabotopic gluatamate receptors (mGluR5) to abnormally activate Fyn kinase and impair synapse function (Um et al., 2012; Haas and Strittmatter, 2016). These results have raised the important question of whether interfering with AβO-PrPC interactions could mitigate AD phenotypes and rescue memory. Interestingly, endogenous or synthetic ligands of PrPC interrupt AβO-mediated signaling and prevent neurotoxicity in neurons (Haas et al., 2014; Beraldo et al., 2016). Nonetheless, therapeutic implications and detailed mechanisms linking PrPC to AD progression still remain to be determined.
A recent report published in The Journal of Neuroscience has investigated the effects of PrPC ablation in advanced stages of AD (Salazar et al., 2017). Salazar et al. (2017) crossed mice that express AD-linked mutated genes (APP/PS1) with a strain in which Prnp, the gene encoding to PrPC, could be conditionally knocked out by administering tamoxifen. Using these mice enabled the authors to isolate the role of PrPC in disease progression without disrupting any possible function during normal development or the onset of pathology.
Salazar et al. (2017) investigated the effects of Prnp deletion in mice at 12 and 16 months of age by measuring performance in a water maze test before and after treating mice with tamoxifen to delete Prnp. Before treatment with tamoxifen, 12-month-old APP/PS1 showed greater latency to find the hidden platform than WT mice. Remarkably, the tamoxifen administration rescued impaired memory of both 12- and 16-month-old APP/PS1 mice in cognitive tests (Salazar et al., 2017). This indicates that blocking the action of PrPC may be a promising strategy to rescue cognition in late-onset AD. Furthermore, conditional deletion of Prnp rescued synapse loss in 12- and 16-month-old APP/PS1 mice, as measured by levels of the synaptic proteins PSD-95 and SV2A (Salazar et al., 2017). Therefore, the interaction between PrPC and AβOs appears to be involved in maintaining cognitive impairment in later stages of AD, making it an attractive therapeutic target.
The interaction between PrPC and mGluR5 has previously been shown to play a key role in the persistence of LTD in AD models (Hu et al., 2014). The PrPC-mGluR5 complex, triggered by AβOs, promotes phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2). This results in impaired protein synthesis and preferential translation of so-called “LTD proteins” that orchestrate synaptic weakening and loss (Um et al., 2013). Importantly, Salazar et al. (2017) showed that ablation of PrPC in APP/PS1 mice blocks increased phosphorylation of eEF2, which might result in restoration of protein synthesis, thereby restoring neuronal activity to a basal state. Preclinical evidence indicates positive effects of modulating mGluR5-Fyn-eEF2 signaling pathways in AD models (Kaufman et al., 2015; Haas et al., 2017); thus, the development of pharmacological modulators is expected to test the clinical relevance of these findings.
Notably, the late removal of Prnp gene at 12 months altered neither soluble nor insoluble Aβ species in APP/PS1 mouse brains (Salazar et al., 2017). This corroborates previous findings from the same group showing that Prnp knock-out did not affect Aβ levels (Gimbel et al., 2010) and suggests that PrPC does not contribute to AD pathology by altering amyloid burden. Nevertheless, it is possible that PrPC deletion influences tau hyperphosphorylation because Fyn has been linked to somatodendritic accumulation of Tau (Li and Götz, 2017). Data showing a positive effect of PrPC deletion on tau hyperphosphorylation may reinforce the potential of a therapeutic strategy that targets AβO-PrPC-mGlur5 interaction.
In line with previous findings (Gimbel et al., 2010), Salazar et al. (2017) observed no changes in either astrogliosis or microgliosis after PrPC deletion in aged APP/PS1 mice. Therefore, PrPC appears not to be involved in the neuroinflammatory process in AD brains. Notably, Haas et al. (2017) reported that pharmacological modulation of the interaction between mGluR5 and PrPC did not alleviate astrocytosis and microgliosis of APP/PS1 mice, although it rescued cognitive impairment in these mice. These data point toward the possibility that neuroinflammation and PrPC-mGluR5 comprise parallel pathways downstream of Aβ accumulation converging on synapse failure and cognitive decline (Fig. 1). Importantly, it was recently observed that treatment with ibuprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, prevents cognitive decline in APP/PS1 mice independently of reduction of inflammatory markers: instead, it changed the expression of synaptic plasticity-related genes (Woodling et al., 2016). The possibility that inflammatory and mGluR5-PrPC processes act in synergy suggests that simultaneously targeting these processes would be beneficial, opening a novel approach to halt AD progression.
AβO-induced PrPC signaling and neuroinflammation converge to cause cognitive decline. AβOs can bind to and trigger abnormal signaling cascade in both neurons and glial cells. At synapses, AβOs bind to PrPC and recruit mGluR5, forming a multiprotein complex. This complex signals to increase activation of Fyn and inactivation of eEF2, resulting in reduced protein synthesis. Depletion of PrPC, pharmacological modulation of mGluR5 by using Silent Allosteric Modulation (SAM) or inhibition of Fyn restores cognition. AβOs also induce neuroinflammation, which also leads to cognitive decline. Anti-inflammatory agents, on the other hand, can rescue cognition. Thus, neuroinflammation and PrPC may be convergent or parallel pathways leading to cognitive decline in AD. Neurons and glial cells were adapted from the software Mind The Graph. Left Inset, Expanded view of the synapse, showing AβO-PrPC-mGluR5 activity leading to Fyn activation and eEF2 inactivation. Right Inset, Reprinted with permission (Ledo et al., 2016). Hippocampal slice treated with AβOs and immunostained for Iba-1 and DAPI, showing pronounced microgliosis.
In conclusion, evidence provided by Salazar et al. (2017) indicates that late depletion of PrPC rescues cognition in APP/PS1 mice. Importantly, the results show that ablation of PrPC after disease onset has this beneficial effect on cognition, without changing major disease hallmarks. The collection of preclinical findings regarding the importance of the PrPC-mGluR5 pathway in AD positions PrPC as an attractive therapeutic target and should encourage further steps toward clinical trials.
Footnotes
- Received November 21, 2017.
- Revision received January 23, 2018.
- Accepted January 26, 2018.
-
Editor's Note: These short reviews of recent JNeurosci articles, written exclusively by students or postdoctoral fellows, summarize the important findings of the paper and provide additional insight and commentary. If the authors of the highlighted article have written a response to the Journal Club, the response can be found by viewing the Journal Club at www.jneurosci.org. For more information on the format, review process, and purpose of Journal Club articles, please see http://jneurosci.org/content/preparing-manuscript#journalclub.
-
R.A.S.L.-F. and M.M.O. were supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico predoctoral fellowships.
-
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Correspondence should be addressed to Mauricio M. Oliveira, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Room C-31, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 21941-902. mmoliveira{at}bioqmed.ufrj.br
- Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382146-03$15.00/0
