Table of Contents

Changes in Both Neuron Intrinsic Properties and Neurotransmission Are Needed to Drive the Increase in GnRH Neuron Firing Rate during Estradiol-Positive Feedback

  1. Suzanne M. Moenter1,5,6
  1. 1Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,
  2. 2Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801,
  3. 3Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, and
  4. 4Departments of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics,
  5. 5Obstetrics and Gynecology, and
  6. 6Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
  1. Author contributions: C.A. wrote the first draft of the paper; R.A.D., C.A.C., L.S.M., and S.S. edited the paper; C.A., R.A.D., S.S., and S.M.M. designed research; C.A. performed research; L.S.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; C.A., C.A.C., and S.M.M. analyzed data; C.A. and S.M.M. wrote the paper.

Abstract

Central output of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons controls fertility and is sculpted by sex-steroid feedback. A switch of estradiol action from negative to positive feedback initiates a surge of GnRH release, culminating in ovulation. In ovariectomized mice bearing constant-release estradiol implants (OVX+E), GnRH neuron firing is suppressed in the morning (AM) by negative feedback and activated in the afternoon (PM) by positive feedback; no time-of-day-dependent changes occur in OVX mice. In this daily surge model, GnRH neuron intrinsic properties are shifted to favor increased firing during positive feedback. It is unclear whether this shift and the observed concomitant increase in GABAergic transmission, which typically excites GnRH neurons, are independently sufficient for increasing GnRH neuron firing rate during positive feedback or whether both are needed. To test this, we used dynamic clamp to inject selected previously recorded trains of GABAergic postsynaptic conductances (PSgs) collected during the different feedback states of the daily surge model into GnRH neurons from OVX, OVX+E AM, and OVX+E PM mice. PSg trains mimicking positive feedback initiated more action potentials in cells from OVX+E PM mice than negative feedback or OVX (open feedback loop) trains in all three animal models, but the positive-feedback train was most effective when applied to cells during positive feedback. In silico studies of model GnRH neurons in which >1000 PSg trains were tested exhibited the same results. These observations support the hypothesis that GnRH neurons integrate fast-synaptic and intrinsic changes to increase firing rates during positive feedback.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Infertility affects 15%–20% of couples; failure to ovulate is a common cause. Understanding how the brain controls ovulation is critical for new developments in both infertility treatment and contraception. Ovarian estradiol alters both the intrinsic properties of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons and synaptic inputs to these cells coincident with production of sustained GnRH release that ultimately triggers ovulation. We demonstrate here using dynamic clamp and mathematical modeling that estradiol-induced shifts in synaptic transmission alone can increase firing output, but that the intrinsic properties of GnRH neurons during positive feedback further poise these cells for increased response to higher frequency synaptic transmission. These data suggest that GnRH neurons integrate fast-synaptic and intrinsic changes to increase firing rates during the preovulatory GnRH surge.

  • Received November 7, 2018.
  • Revision received December 27, 2018.
  • Accepted January 10, 2019.

Related Article