Distinct Waking States for Strong Evoked Responses in Primary Visual Cortex and Optimal Visual Detection Performance

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Vm of V1 cortical neurons exhibits depolarization and decreased variability as a function of arousal, with most depolarized and least variable Vm during locomotion. A, Example traces of Vm from a V1 layer 5 regular-spiking, putative pyramidal cell, pupil diameter, and locomotion speed. Inset 1 emphasizes Vm changes associated with the transition from stillness to locomotion. Inset 2 emphasizes the relationship between pupillary microdilations (arrows) and Vm depolarizations during stillness. Spikes are truncated in example traces to emphasize subthreshold behavior. B, Coherence between pupil diameter and Vm. Coherence is high at low frequencies (0.01–0.02 Hz), with a smaller secondary peak from ∼0.1–0.3 Hz, likely reflecting the tracking of pupillary microdilations by Vm. C, Cross-correlation between pupil diameter and Vm, showing a lag of ∼1 s between changes in Vm and associated changes in pupil diameter. D, Mean spontaneous Vm (expressed as a change in Vm from the most hyperpolarized Vm recorded during a session) as a function of baseline pupil diameter and sorted by locomotion status. E, Vm SD as a function of baseline pupil diameter and sorted by locomotion status. F, Vm Hilbert amplitude at 2–10 Hz and 50–100 Hz as a function of baseline pupil diameter and sorted by locomotion status. G, Density plot, pooling Vm values recorded from all cells in the dataset, encapsulating data shown in D and E. Each vertical slice of the plot is the probability distribution of ΔVm (the difference between Vm in a recorded cell and the most hyperpolarized Vm recorded in that cell) in a given pupil diameter range. A more dispersed probability distribution is evident at smaller pupil diameters, while a narrower distribution is evident at larger pupil diameters. For pupil diameter bins in D–G, bin widths were chosen such that an equal amount of data fell into each bin (N = 8 animals, n = 10 cells; data are shown as mean ± 68% CI).

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 39 no. 50 10044-10059
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement