Suppressive Control of Incentive Salience in Real-World Human Vision

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Results from conditions where participants searched for plants, which were used to test motivating experimental hypotheses regarding attentional capture. A, When participants searched for plants in scenes containing a single additional distractor, accuracy degraded when that distractor was associated with reward. However, when the scene contained both a lateral and a central distractor — and therefore always contained examples of both the high-reward and low-reward distractor categories — accuracy was insensitive to the specific locations of the two distractors. B, Similar results emerge in reaction times. When participants searched for plants in scenes containing a single additional distractor, reaction times increased when that distractor was associated with reward. However, when the scene contained two distractors, reaction time was insensitive to the specific location of these distractors.

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 43 no. 37 6415-6429
  1. Free Access 
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement