Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 7.
Figure 7.

MVPA results. A, Decoding accuracy of Action types (real vs pantomimed) at the Plan and Execute phases. Data from knife and fork tool use were combined. B, Decoding accuracy of Action types cross tools at the Plan and Execute phases. For cross-tool Action type decoding, the train data set was from one tool (knife or fork) and test data set was from the other (fork or knife), and the results were averaged. C, Decoding accuracy of Tool types (knife vs fork). Data from real and pantomimed tool use was combined. The decoding accuracies were compared with chance level (50%). FDR correction was performed to correct for multiple comparisons. * indicates significant after FDR correction (q < 0.05). Error bars indicate ±1 SE.

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 43 no. 46 7853-7867
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement