Skin Reinnervation by Collateral Sprouting Following Spared Nerve Injury in Mice

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

Figure 8.
Figure 8.

Collateral sprouting contributes to functional recovery of sensory neurons after peripheral nerve injury. A, Immunostaining for EYFP (green) in lumbar DRGs from PirtCre+;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Whole mount immunostaining for EYFP (green) on the contralateral and ipsilateral hindpaw plantar hairy skin before and 1 and 8 weeks after SNI in PirtCre+;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP mice. C, Schematic of mouse paw stimulation using 473 nm blue laser (left) and the frequency of withdrawal from light stimulation of the hindpaw of PirtCre+;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP and PirtCre-;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP mice (right). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Mann-Whitney test. ***p = 0.0002, Cre- versus Cre+. D, Time course of 100 ms blue light-induced paw withdrawal frequency in the ipsilateral tibial nerve-stimulated plantar hair skin after SNI (n = 11) and sham (n = 9) surgery in PirtCre+;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP mice. In panels D, E, and I, circles represent data from individual mice. E, Time course of 10 ms blue light-induced paw withdrawal frequency in the ipsilateral tibial nerve-stimulated plantar hair skin after SNI (n = 11) and sham (n = 9) surgery in PirtCre+;Rosa26LSL-ChR2-EYFP mice. In panels D and E, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with p-value from overall comparison between groups over time shown at top. Results of Bonferroni post hoc correction shown as: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, sham versus SNI. All quantified data are presented as mean ± SEM. In panels C,F,G,H, symbols represent individual mice. F, Time course of pinprick (red) or 1.4 g von Frey filament (blue) evoked mechanical sensitivity, after SNI, in the ipsilateral tibial nerve-innervated plantar hairy skin of C57BL6 mice (n = 10). One-way repeated measures ANOVA with p-value for difference between baseline and ipsilateral hindpaw s over time shown at bottom. Results of Bonferroni post hoc correction shown as: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001. G, Punctate mechanical sensitivity measured across forces in the ipsilateral tibial nerve-innervated plantar hairy skin of C57BL6 mice at baseline (grey), and 1 (black), 4 (blue), and 8 weeks (red) after SNI (n = 10). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with p-value from overall comparison between groups over time shown at bottom. Results of Bonferroni post hoc correction shown as: ****p < 0.0001, baseline versus SNI. H, Punctate mechanical sensitivity measured across forces using von Frey filaments in the ipsilateral sural nerve-innervated lateral hindpaw plantar skin at baseline (grey), and 1 (black), 4 (blue), and 8 weeks (red) after SNI (n = 10). Two-way ANOVA with p-value from overall comparison between groups over time shown at bottom. Results of Bonferroni post hoc correction shown as: ****p < 0.0001, baseline versus SNI. I, Time course of hindpaw sensitivity to 0.4 g von Frey filaments, after SNI, in the contralateral and ipsilateral tibial nerve-innervated plantar hairy skin of C57BL6 mice (n = 10). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with p-value from overall comparison between groups over time shown at top. Results of Bonferroni post hoc correction shown as: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001, contra versus ipsi. Full statistical details can be found in Table 1.

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 44 no. 15
  1. Free Access 
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement