Coupling of Sharp Wave Events between Zebrafish Hippocampal and Amygdala Homologs

Table 3.

SW/SWR events are modulated by GABAA and AMPA but not by NMDA receptor signaling

Drug exposure, n SW abundance (/min; mean ± SEM) p value SW amplitude (µV; mean ± SEM) p value SW duration (ms; mean ± SEM) p value %SWR abundance (/min; mean ± SEM) p value Ripple power (µV2; mean ± SEM) p value

aCSF

30 µM AP-5

N = 8

24.36 ± 4.625

19.19 ± 2.890

0.2169

17.11 ± 6.175

15.32 ± 4.212

0.7101

441.1 ± 53.61

446.0 ± 55.92

0.8945

18.87 ± 5.651

17.96 ± 7.323

0.8945

aCSF

5 µM NBQX + 25 µM AP-5

N = 4

23.50 ± 4.481

0.000 ± 0.000

0.0135*

aCSF

30 µM BMI

N = 7

27.14 ± 6.319

28.39 ± 6.287

0.8585

18.84 ± 5.252

20.42 ± 6.457

0.5503

212.2 ± 36.71

287.1 ± 39.56

0.0027**

7.307 ± 1.472

22.79 ± 5.716

0.0182*

5.549 ± 0.613

7.594 ± 0.969

0.0486*
  • Electrophysiology recordings were done at baseline (aCSF) and continued upon drug exposure. Changes in the abundance, amplitude, and duration of SW events were measured for AP-5 and BMI. Since NBQX abolished events, no further analyses were done. % SWR (SW/SWR*100) abundance was measured for AP-5 and BMI. Ripple power was further measured for BMI. Paired Student's t tests were performed.

  • *p < 0.05, **p < 0.005.

  1. The Journal of Neuroscience vol. 44 no. 17
Responses to This Article
Be the first to respond to this article
Advertisement