Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception
- Jules Erkens1,
- Ram K. Pari1,
- Marina Inyutina1,
- Mathieu Marx1,2,
- Florian H. Kasten1,3,4, and
- Benedikt Zoefel1
- 1Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Toulouse 31100, France
- 2Service ORL, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse 31100, France
- 3Department for Cognitive, Affective, Behavioral Neuroscience with Focus Neurostimulation, Institute of Psychology, University of Trier, Trier 54296, Germany
- 4Institute for Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience (ICAN), University of Trier, Trier 54296, Germany
-
Author contributions: J.E. and B.Z. designed research; J.E., R.K.P., M.I., and M.M. performed research; M.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; J.E., R.K.P., F.H.K., and B.Z. analyzed data; J.E. wrote the paper.
Abstract
Segregating important stimuli from distractors is crucial for successful speech perception. Neural activity synchronized to speech, also termed “neural speech tracking,” is thought to be instrumental for this purpose. However, whether neural tracking of targets and distractors both play a similarly important role for speech perception in a setting with multiple competing speakers is rarely examined. In 61 human participants (30 males, 31 females), we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to presumably manipulate neural tracking of two simultaneously presented sequences of rhythmic speech while participants attended to one of them. A random temporal relationship between speech streams allowed us to disentangle effects of tACS on target and distractor processing and to examine their combined effect on a behavioral measure of speech perception. We found that the phase relation between tACS and both target and distracting speech modulated word report accuracy to a similar degree. This effect was observed during bilateral tACS over auditory regions and the inferior frontal gyrus and, importantly, in a control “shunt” group that received near-identical cutaneous stimulation but ∼50% reduced brain stimulation. These results imply that, although tACS phase modulates the perception of both target and distracting speech, the cutaneous stimulation accompanying tACS can induce phase effects in speech perception that resemble those observed with conventional tACS. Our finding illustrates the urgent need to control for cutaneous stimulation in tACS studies.
- neural oscillations
- neural tracking
- speech perception
- stream segregation
- transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
- Received February 17, 2025.
- Revision received January 22, 2026.
- Accepted January 25, 2026.
- Copyright © 2026 the authors





