A collaborator's reputation can bias decisions and anxiety under uncertainty

  1. Dean Mobbs1
  1. 1California Institute of Technology
  2. 2Columbia University
  1. Correspondence author: Dean Mobbs PhD, Humanities and Social Sciences, and Computation and Neural Systems Program, 319 Baxter Hall, California Institute of Technology (Caltech), Pasadena, California, 91125, MC 228-77, Phone: +1 626 714 8913, Email: dmobbs{at}caltech.edu
  1. Author contributions: D.M. and O.F. designed research; D.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools; D.M., C.C., S.Q., and O.F. wrote the paper; S.Q. and O.F. analyzed data; O.F. performed research.

Abstract

Informational social influence theory posits that under conditions of uncertainty, we are inclined to look to others for advice. This leaves us remarkably vulnerable to being influenced by other's opinions or advice. Rational agents, however, do not blindly seek and act on arbitrary information, but often consider the quality of its source before committing to a course of action. Here, we ask the question of whether a collaborator's reputation can increase their social influence and, in turn bias perception and anxiety under changing levels of uncertainty. Human male and female participants were asked to provide estimations of dot direction using the random dot motion (RDM) perceptual discrimination task and paired with transient collaborators of high or low reputation whom provided their own estimations. The RDM varied in degrees of uncertainty and joint performance accuracy was linked to risk of an electric shock. Despite providing identical information, we show that collaborating with a high reputation compared to a low reputation partner, led to significantly more conformity during the RDM task for uncertain perceptual decisions. Consequently, high reputation partners decreased the subjects' anxiety during the anticipatory shock periods. fMRI data showed that parametric changes in conformity resulted in increased activity in the ventromedial PFC, while dissent was associated with increased in activity the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Furthermore, the dACC and insula, regions involved in anticipatory pain were significantly more active when collaborating with a low reputation partner. These results suggest that information about reputation can influence both cognitive and affective processes and in turn alter the neural circuits that underlie decision-making and emotion.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Humans look to others for advice when making decisions under uncertainty. Rational agents, however, do not blindly seek information, but often consider the quality of its source before committing to a course of action. Here, we ask the question of whether a collaborators' reputation can increase social influence and in turn bias perception and anxiety in the context of perceptual uncertainty. We show that when subjects are partnered with collaborators with a high reputation, this leads to increased conformity during uncertain perceptual decision-making and reduces anxiety when joint performance accuracy leads to an electric shock. Furthermore, our results show that information about reputation alters the neural circuits that underlie decision-making and emotion.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) grant 2P50MH094258 (DM and CFC), and start-up funds from Columbia University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

  • Received August 17, 2017.
  • Revision received December 4, 2017.
  • Accepted January 13, 2018.